SCHLEIER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Griffin, 589 F.2d 200 (5th Cir. 1979)
  …se where the requisite element of obstruction was found in sham inability to remember and blocking of the court’s inquiry. United States v. Appel, S.D.N.Y.1913, 211 F. 495. See also Schleier v. United States, 2 Cir. 1934, 72 F. 2d 414, cert, denied, 293 U.S. 607, 55 S.Ct. 123, 79 L.Ed. 697. See generally Dobbs, Contempt of Court: A Survey, 56 Corn.L.Rev. 183, 194-200 (1971). This additional element is present in the case before us. Griffin’s testimony did not merely require the grand jury to ascertain the t…
• Bassick v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 85 F.2d 8 (2d Cir. 1936)
  …t the date the petitioner would have us consider, would be sufficient to hold that this sale did not come within section 202 (c) (3) of the Revenue Act of 1921. In American Compress & Warehouse Co. v. Bender, 70 F.(2d) 655 (C.C.A. 5), cert. denied, 293 U.S. 607, 55 S.Ct. 123, 79 L.Ed. 698, nothing appears to show any connection between the sale of the stock of the new corporation received by the transferor corporation and the transaction between the transferor and the transferee. The mere fact that only a…
• In re Grand Jury Witness Chanie Weiss, 703 F.2d 653 (2d Cir. 1983)
  …(2d Cir.1910); United States v. Appel, 211 F. 495 (S.D.N.Y.1913); United States v. McGovern, 60 F. 2d 880, 889 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 287 U.S. 650, 53 S.Ct. 96, 77 L.Ed. 561 (1932); Schleier v. United States, 72 F. 2d 414 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 293 U.S. 607, 55 S.Ct. 123, 79 L.Ed. 697 (1934); In re Eskay, 122 F. 2d 819 (3d Cir. 1941); Howard v. United States, 182 F. 2d 908 (8th Cir.), vacated and remanded as moot, 340 U.S. 898, 71 S.Ct. 278, 95 L.Ed. 651 (1950); Richardson v. United States, 273 F. 2d 1…