TOLFREE
v.
NEW YORK TITLE & MORTGAGE CO. ET AL.; REES V. SAME; JACOBY ET AL. V. BOND & MORTGAGE GUARANTEE CO. ET AL.; AND DEPEN ET AL. V. LAWYERS TITLE & GUARANTY CO. ET AL.
TOLFREE
NEW YORK TITLE & MORTGAGE CO. ET AL.; REES V. SAME; JACOBY ET AL. V. BOND & MORTGAGE GUARANTEE CO. ET AL.; AND DEPEN ET AL. V. LAWYERS TITLE & GUARANTY CO. ET AL.
293 U.S. 619
Supreme Court of the United States (1934)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Motlow v. S. Holding & Sec. Corp., 95 F.2d 721 (8th Cir. 1938)…ct to the direction, supervision, and control of the court entering the order of liquidation. [*725] The Circuit Court of Appeals of the Second Circuit, in the case of Tolfree v. New York Title & Mortgage Co. et al., 72 F. 2d 702, certiorari denied, 293 U.S. 619, 55 S.Ct. 216, 79 L.Ed. 707, has held that, by virtue of a similar order of court and article 11 of the New York Insurance Law, section 400 et seq., the superintendent of insurance became in effect a receiver under the supervision of the state court…
-
Solange Landau v. Vallen, 895 F.2d 888 (2d Cir. 1990)…“regret at the unfortunate collision between the two courts”); The Lottawanna, 87 U.S. (20 Wall.) at 214; Clarkson Co. v. Shaheen, 716 F. 2d 126, 129 (2d Cir.1983); Tolfree v. New York Title & Mortgage Co., 72 F. 2d 702, 704 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 293 U.S. 619, 55 S.Ct. 216, 79 L.Ed. 707 (1934); Bucher, 36 F. 2d at 775 (7th Cir.1929) (refusing to honor state-court attachment, explaining that “[a] bill which can reach no result except by staying the ordinary and rightful exercise of the essential functions…
-
Alliance OF Am. Insurers v. Cuomo, 854 F.2d 591 (2d Cir. 1988)…07 F. 2d at 44 (quoting Burford, 319 U.S. at 333-34, 63 S.Ct. at 1107-08). The District Court relied upon Levy and Law Enforcement Ins. Co., as well as the decisions in Tolfree v. New York Title & Mortgage Co., 72 F. 2d 702 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 293 U.S. 619, 55 S.Ct. 216, 79 L.Ed. 707 (1934) (pre-Burford case in which the court abstained for comity reasons in action seeking injunction against an ongoing state court liquidation) and Ambiance, Inc. v. Commodore General Ins. Co., 553 F.Supp. 285 (S.D.N.Y.…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence