H. M. BYLLESBY & CO.

v.

OTIS, JUDGE

Citator

Cited By

• State v. Jones, 678 So. 2d 1336 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996)
  …t factual event. One purpose of the time allegations found in an information is to fix the time of the alleged commission of the offense with such certainty as to protect the accused from a second prosecution for the same offense. Collier v. State, 293 U.S. 622, 55 S.Ct. 237, 79 L.Ed. 709, cert. denied 116 Fla. 703, 156 So. 703 (1934). The informations here encompass separate time frames, with Case No. 95-852 alleging aggravated stalking “on the 30th day of April, 1995” by “knowingly, willfully, maliciousl…
• Aro Mfg. Co., Inc. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co., Inc., 377 U.S. 476 (U.S. 1964)
  …gement.” Union Special Mach. Co. v. Maimin, 161 F. 748, 750 (C. C. E. D. Pa. 1908), aff’d, 165 F. 440 (C. A. 3d Cir. 1908). Accord, Remington Rand Business Serv., Inc., v. Acme Card System Co., 71 F. 2d 628, 630 (C. A. 4th Cir. 1934), cert. denied, 293 U. S. 622; 2 Walker, Patents (Deller ed. 1937), at 1487. Consequently replacement of worn-out fabric components with fabrics sold by Aro, held in Aro I to constitute “repair” rather than “reconstruction” and thus to be permissible in the case of licensed Gene…
• Studiengesellschaft Kohle mbH for the Max-Planck-Institut für Kohlenforschung v. N. Petrochemical Co., 784 F.2d 351 (Fed. Cir. 1986)
  …required restriction and then had granted separate patents, courts had occasionally invalidated patents for double patenting. See, e.g., Remington Rand Business Service, Inc. v. Acme Card System Co., 71 F. 2d 628, 22 USPQ 1 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 293 U.S. 622, 55 S.Ct. 236, 79 L.Ed. 710 (1934). The purpose of including § 121[3] in the 1952 Patent Act was to protect the patentee from the consequences of this PTO practice.2 The first printed text of this remedial legislation included the following provisi…