AMERICAN SILK MILLS, INC.

v.

IRVING TRUST CO. ET AL., RECEIVERS

Citator

Cited By

• S. Ry. Co. v. Seaborn J. Flournoy, 301 F.2d 847 (4th Cir. 1962)
  …p proceedings. St. Louis & S. F. R. R. v. Spiller, supra, 274 U.S. at 311, 47 S.Ct. at 637; Dictaphone Sales Corp. v. Powell, 77 F. 2d 795, 797 (4 Cir. 1935); Continental Trust Co. v. W. R. Bonsal & Co., 72 F. 2d 975, 980 (4 Cir. 1934), cert. denied 293 U.S. 624, 55 S.Ct. 239, 79 L.Ed. 711 (1934). Nothing unique lifts the claims now on appeal out of the six-month category —from July 19, 1959 to January 19, 1960. But we think all save one meet every criteria comprising the sovereign equity. The exception to…
• FOX v. McGRATH, 152 F.2d 616 (2d Cir. 1945)
  …ted or supplied, * * * or, if a substantial right of any party shall not be thereby prejudiced, * * * must be disregarded.” See Irving Trust Co. v. American Silk Mills, 2 Cir., 72 F. 2d 288, certiorari denied American Silk Mills v. Irving Trust Co., 293 U.S. 624, 55 S.Ct 239, 79 L.Ed. 711; Mishkind-Feinberg Realty Co. v. Sidorsky, 189 N.Y. 402, 82 N.E. 448. True, there is a cryptic suggestion from the debtor that a guaranty of payment given to Fox by one of the Bank’s directors “may make its validity quest…