MERRILL
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1935-01-07
No. 543
293 U.S. 627 Supreme Court of the United States (1935) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …anders v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 146 Tex. 169, 205 S.W. 2d 43, 44, 173 A.L.R. 968; Sun Mutual Ins. Co. v. Mattingly, 77 Tex. 162, 13 S.W. 1016; Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Peoples Bank of Sanborn, 4 Cir., 72 F. 2d 932, 939, certiorari denied 293 U.S. 627, 55 S.Ct. 348, 79 L.Ed. 714. The evidence was sufficient to support the judgment and no error of law appears requiring a reversal. Judgment affirmed. . Glenn furnished a very complete affidavit to the insurer dated January 17, 1953 in which he ga…
  • …nd a per se rule that unauthorized loans are dishonest is unwarranted. A person may exceed his or her authority without a dishonest purpose, see e.g., Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Peoples Bank of Sanford, 72 F. 2d 932 (4th Cir.), cert. den. 293 U.S. 627, 55 S.Ct. 348, 79 L.Ed. 714 (1934), and while the terms of the bond should be broadly construed, there is no justification for extending coverage to all unauthorized acts, see Central National Life Insurance Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw