OHIO ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
OHIO ET AL.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
293 U.S. 627
Supreme Court of the United States (1934)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Other
A rehearing is granted to the appellant Empire Sheet & Tinplate Company as respects only so much of the decree of the court below and the order of the Interstate Commerce Commission in its docket No. 7036, Empire Steel Corp. v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. et al., as affects the reduction in the rate by the Ohio Public Utilities Commission between the Cambridge district and Mansfield, Ohio, from $1.76 to $1.61, and the restoration thereof by the Interstate Commerce Commission to $1.76. See 292 U. S. 498.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
New Amsterdam Cas. Co. v. W. D. Felder & Co., Inc., 214 F.2d 825 (5th Cir. 1954)…anders v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 146 Tex. 169, 205 S.W. 2d 43, 44, 173 A.L.R. 968; Sun Mutual Ins. Co. v. Mattingly, 77 Tex. 162, 13 S.W. 1016; Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Peoples Bank of Sanborn, 4 Cir., 72 F. 2d 932, 939, certiorari denied 293 U.S. 627, 55 S.Ct. 348, 79 L.Ed. 714. The evidence was sufficient to support the judgment and no error of law appears requiring a reversal. Judgment affirmed. . Glenn furnished a very complete affidavit to the insurer dated January 17, 1953 in which he ga…
-
The Rock Island Bank v. The AETNA Cas. & Sur. Co., 706 F.2d 219 (7th Cir. 1983)…nd a per se rule that unauthorized loans are dishonest is unwarranted. A person may exceed his or her authority without a dishonest purpose, see e.g., Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Peoples Bank of Sanford, 72 F. 2d 932 (4th Cir.), cert. den. 293 U.S. 627, 55 S.Ct. 348, 79 L.Ed. 714 (1934), and while the terms of the bond should be broadly construed, there is no justification for extending coverage to all unauthorized acts, see Central National Life Insurance Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland…
Authorities Cited
- Ohio v. United States, 292 U.S. 498 (U.S. 1934)