PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE CO.
v.
STATE HIGHWAY COMM'N

U.S. | 1935-02-18
No. 412
294 U.S. 696 Supreme Court of the United States (1935) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Fox Film Corp. v. Muller, 296 U.S. 207 (U.S. 1935)
    …he state supreme court affirmed. 192 Minn. 212; 255 N. W. 845. We granted certiorari, 293 U. S. 550; but, when the case was called for argument, it appeared that no final judgment had been entered and the writ was dismissed as improvidently granted. 294 U. S. 696. The case was then remanded to the state supreme court; and, the judgment having been made final, and again affirmed by the state supreme court on the authority of its previous opinion, 194 Minn. 654; 260 N. W. 320, we allowed the present writ. 295…
  • …allowa Nat. Bank, 287 U. S. 575; Fort Smith Sub. R. Co. v. Kansas City So. R. Co., 288 U. S. 587; Boynton v. Hutchinson Gas Co., 292 U. S. 601; Lynch v. New York, 293 U. S. 52; Hunt v. Western Casualty Co., 293 U. S. 530; Fox Film Corp. v. Muller, 294 U. S. 696; State Automobile Ins. Assn. v. Glick, 294 U. S. 697; Moor v. Texas & N. O. R. Co., 297 U. S. 101; Texas & N. O. R. Co. v. Neill, 302 U. S. 645; Aetna Ins. Co. v. Illinois Central R. Co., 302 U. S. 652; Tax Commission v. Wilbur, 304 U. S. 544; Goo…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw