EYERLY AIRCRAFT COMPANY, AN OREGON CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
ROBERT MCDANIEL, JR., A MINOR, BY AND THROUGH HIS FATHER, ROBERT MCDANIEL, SR., AND ROBERT MCDANIEL, INDIVIDUALLY, AND BLUE GRASS SHOWS, INC., A KENTUCKY CORPORATION, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The appellate court affirmed a lower court's decision, finding that the defendant, Eyerly Aircraft Corporation, had sufficient minimum contacts with Florida to be subject to its jurisdiction, despite the defendant's arguments to the contrary.
Yes, the court found that Eyerly Aircraft Corporation had sufficient minimum contacts within the State of Florida to be subject to the jurisdiction of the Florida courts.
“The record discloses such "minimum contacts" within the State as to subject appellant to the jurisdiction of the Florida Court.”
This quote establishes the court's primary reasoning for affirming the lower court's decision.
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceEyerly Aircraft Corporation (appellant) appealed an order denying its motions to dismiss based on jurisdictional issues. The appellant argued it was n…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Constructive Service Of Process cases and more on FLexlaw
Defendant Eyerly Aircraft Corporation appeals an interlocutory order at law denying its motions to dismiss on jurisdictional issues.1 Appellant asserts, inter alia, that it is not sufficiently engaged in a business venture in the State of Florida so as to be amenable to constructive service of process.2
We find no error. The record discloses such “minimum contacts” within the State as to subject appellant to the jurisdiction of the Florida Court. Steel Joist Institute, Inc. v. J. H. Mann, III, Inc., Fla.App.1965, 171 So.2d 625, Second District, opinion filed 22 January 1965, Cf. Woodring v. Crown Engineering Co., Fla.App.1962, 141 So.2d 816, 818 citing McGee v. International Life Ins. Co., 1957, 355 U.S. 220, 221, 78 S.Ct. 199, 2 L.Ed.2d 223; State ex rel. Guardian Credit Indem. Corp. v. Harrison, Fla.1954, 74 So.2d 371. Other arguments presented require no discussion.
Affirmed.
SHANNON, Acting C. J., and WHITE and ANDREWS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- McGEE v. Int'l Life Ins. Co., 355 U.S. 220 (U.S. 1957)
- State ex rel. Guardian Credit Indem. Corp. v. Harrison, 74 So. 2d 371 (Fla. 1954)
- Woodring v. Crown Eng'g Co., 141 So. 2d 816 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962)
- Steel Joist Inst., Inc. v. J. H. Mann, III, Inc., 171 So. 2d 625 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965)