STELOS CO., INC.
v.
HOSIERY MOTOR-MEND CORP. ET AL.; AND HOSIERY MOTOR-MEND CORP. ET AL. V. STELOS CO., INC.

U.S. | 1935-02-18
Nos. 588; No. 653
294 U.S. 702 Supreme Court of the United States (1935) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Stelos Co. v. Hosiery Motor-Mend Corp., 295 U.S. 237 (U.S. 1935)
    …needle should be held at an angle to the plane of the fabric, if that is in fact what the claim means, is insufficient to raise the method to the dignity of invention. Decree modified and, as modified, affirmed. 60 F. (2d) 1009. 72 F. (2d) 405. 294 U. S. 702. Finch Corp. v. Stelos Co., 60 App. D. C. 25; 46 F. (2d) 606. Langnes v. Green, 282 U. S. 531, 535. 294 U. S. 702. U. S. C. Tit. 35, § 33. Notice that defendants would defend on this ground was given in accordance with R. S. 4920; U. S. C. Tit.…
    1 / 2

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw