MINNESOTA MINING & MANUFACTURING CO.

v.

GUTH

Citator

Cited By

• Fraser v. Doing, 130 F.2d 617 (D.C. Cir. 1942)
  …5 U.S. 407, 411, 35 S.Ct. 125, 59 L.Ed. 289. Irvin v. Buick Motor Co., 8 Cir., 88 F. 2d 947, 949, certiorari denied 301 U.S. 702, 57 S.Ct. 932, 81 L.Ed. 1357. See Simonds v. Norwich Union Indemnity Co., 8 Cir., 73 F. 2d 412, 415, certiorari denied 294 U.S. 711, 55 S.Ct. 507, 79 L.Ed. 1246: “Bills of review may be maintained upon the following grounds: (1) For error apparent in the record; (2) newly discovered evidence; (3) fraud in procuring the decree. After appeal, where the appellate court has sent dow…
• Brady v. Beams, 132 F.2d 985 (10th Cir. 1942)
  …U.S. 82, 42 S.Ct. 196, 66 L.Ed. 475; Continental Oil Co. v. Osage Oil & Refining Co., 10 Cir., 69 F. 2d 19, certiorari denied, 287 U.S. 616, 53 S.Ct. 17, 77 L.Ed. 535; Simonds v. Norwich Union Indemnity Co., 8 Cir., 73 F. 2d 412, certiorari denied, 294 U.S. 711, 55 S.Ct. 507, 79 L.Ed. 1246; Ex parte Thomas, 73 App.D.C. 50, 114 F. 2d 847. But it may be assumed without deciding that appellants are correct in their contention that the action is not a bill of review; that instead it is an independent action;…
• Stokes & Smith Co. v. Transparent-Wrap Mach. Corp., 156 F.2d 198 (2d Cir. 1946)
  …ther’s argument does not suggest the contrary. The situation would seem to be analogous to requiring an employee t.o assign inventions made in the course of his employment. Guth v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co., 7 Cir., 72 F. 2d 385, certiorari denied 294 U.S. 711, 55 S.Ct. 506, 79 L.Ed. 1245. Even if the seller of the business owned a patent under which the buyer received a license, a stipulation that any improvement patents should belong to the licensor would formerly have been sustained. See Allbright-Nel…