MORLEY
v.
UNIVERSITY OF DETROIT

U.S. | 1935-03-04
No. 664
294 U.S. 718 Supreme Court of the United States (1935) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …t of insurance to the members.” The principle that mutuality involves insurance at cost has likewise been applied by this court to fire insurance companies. In MacLaughlin v. Philadelphia Contributionship, 1934, 73 F. 2d 582, 584, certiorari denied 294 U.S. 718, 55 S.Ct. 544, 79 L.Ed. 1251, this court was called upon to construe Section 231(11) of the Revenue Act of 1926, 26 U.S.C.A. Int.Rev.Code § 101(11), which accorded to mutual fire insurance companies a tax exempt status. The court held that the taxpa…
  • …ted in Driscoll v. Washington County Fire Ins. Co., 3 Cir., 1940, 110 F. 2d 485, certiorari denied, 1940, 311 U.S. 658, 61 S.Ct. 12, 85 L.Ed. -; MacLaughlin v. Philadelphia Contributionship, etc., 3 Cir., 1934, 73 F. 2d 582, certiorari denied, 1935, 294 U.S. 718, 55 S.Ct. 544, 79 L.Ed. 1251; Baltimore Equitable Soc. v. United States, Ct.Cl.1933, 3 F.Supp. 427, certiorari denied, 1933, 290 U.S. 662, 54 S.Ct. 77, 78 L.Ed. 573. The Supreme Court in Penn Mutual Co. v. Lederer, 1920, 252 U.S. 523, 533, 40 S.Ct.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw