AMERICAN SURETY CO.

v.

MORAN, RECEIVER

Citator

Cited By

• Alabama-Tennessee Natural GAS Co. v. Fed. Power Comm'n, 359 F.2d 318 (5th Cir. 1966)
  …Bulova Watch Company v. United States, 365 U.S. 753, 81 S.Ct. 864, 6 L. Ed.2d 72; Enzor v. United States, 5 Cir. 1959, 262 F,2d 172, cert. den. 359 U.S. 953, 79 S.Ct. 740, 3 L.Ed.2d 761; Price v. United States, 5 Cir. 1934, 74 F. 2d 120, cert. den. 294 U.S. 720, 55 S.Ct. 549, 79 L.Ed. 1252, reh. den. 295 U.S. 767, 55 S.Ct. 643, 79 L.Ed. 1708.” . When the California Public Utilities Commission sought review of this court’s decision in El Paso in the Supreme Court, the Solicitor General of the United States…
• Georges v. United States, 262 F.2d 426 (5th Cir. 1959)
  …the particular statute is to be preferred over the general statute. Enzor v. United States, 5 Cir., 1958, 262 F. 2d 172; Masi [*432] v. United States, 5 Cir., 1955, 223 F. 2d 132; Price v. United States, 5 Cir., 1934, 74 F. 2d 120, certiorari denied 294 U.S. 720, 55 S.Ct. 549, 79 L.Ed. 1252, rehearing denied 295 U.S. 767, 55 S.Ct. 643, 79 L.Ed. 1708. The alleged belief is as unsound as a matter of law as it is doubtful as a matter of fact. The district court heard the testimony. The conflicting statements…
• Erwin Manget Enzor v. United States, 262 F.2d 172 (5th Cir. 1958)
  …tment. As between two statutes punishing conspiracy, the particular statute is entitled to preference over the general statute. Masi v. United States, 5 Cir., 1955, 223 F. 2d 132; Price v. United states, 5 Cir., 1934, 74 F. 2d 120, certiorari denied 294 U.S. 720, 55 S.Ct. 549, 79 L.Ed. 1252, rehearing denied 295 U.S. 767, 55 S.Ct. 643, 79 L.Ed. 1708; Robinson v. United State, 8 Cir., 1944, 142 F. 2d 431. The statute on which an indictment is founded is to be determined from the' facts charged in the indictm…