JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP.

v.

VANG ET AL., RECEIVERS, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Livesay Window Co., Inc. v. Livesay Indus., Inc., 251 F.2d 469 (5th Cir. 1958)
  …y Glass Co., 3 Cir., 81 F. 2d 352, modified on other grounds, 298 U.S. 448, 56 S.Ct. 792, 80 L.Ed. 1274; Stromberg Motor Devices Co. v. Zenith-Detroit Co., 2 Cir., 73 F. 2d 62, certiorari dismissed Zenith-Detroit Corp. v. Bendix Stromberg Carb. Co., 294 U.S. 735, 55 S.Ct. 509, 79 L.Ed. 1263, and others may indicate that such deduction is permissible in aseertaining damages, tax cases, such as Mathey v. Commissioner, 1 Cir., 177 F. 2d 259, certiorari denied 339 U.S. 943, 70 S.Ct. 797, 94 L.Ed. 1359; Urquhart…
• THE Severance. THE Stone 6. Diamond S. S. Transp. Corp. v. Peoples Sav. Bank & Tr. Co., 152 F.2d 916 (4th Cir. 1945)
  …tum) in the District Court, we think this contention is sound. The law seems settled that the statute does not cover a mere bailee as distinguished from a charterer. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation v. Vang, 3 Cir., 73 F. 2d 88, certiorari denied 294 U.S. 735, 55 S.Ct. 406, 79 L.Ed. 1263. See, also, Benedict on Admiralty (6th ed.) p. 416. In the Jones & Laughlin case, just cited, it was held that the claimant must rather convincingly prove an express charter. Said Circuit Judge Woolley in this case, 73 F…
• Int'l Indus., Inc. v. Warren Petroleum Corp., 248 F.2d 696 (3d Cir. 1957)
  …Co., 7 Cir., 1928, 30 F. 2d 281, 284 (interest at the rate of 5% approved); Stromberg Motor Devices Co. v. Zenith-Detroit Corp., 2 Cir., 1934, 73 F. 2d 62, 64, certiorari dismissed Zenith-Detroit Corporation v. Bendix Stromberg Carburetor Co., 1935, 294 U.S. 735, 55 S.Ct. 509, 79 L.Ed. 1263. And the credit for interest is allowed without regard to the source of the capital invested. Stromberg Motor Devices Co. v. Detroit Trust Co., 7 Cir., 1930, 44 F. 2d 958, 964. It is our opinion that interest ¡mould be…