TEXAS & NEW ORLEANS RAILROAD CO. ET AL.
v.
UNITED STATES ET AL.
Pee Curiam.
This is a suit to restrain the enforcement of two orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission, made July 24, 1933, and December 11, 1933, respectively, relating to rates for the transportation of horses and mules, in carloads, in southwestern territory. 195 I. C. C. 417. Upon the hearing by the District Court, composed of three judges, the application for an injunction was denied and the amended bill of complaint was dismissed.
This Court, upon an examination of the record, agrees with the conclusion of the District Court that the orders in question were sustained by findings of the Commission acting within its statutory authority and that these findings were adequately supported by evidence. The decree is
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (32 total)
-
State v. Will Lewis, 152 Fla. 178 (Fla. 1943)…tection of the law and is deprived of due process of law contrary to the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution. Hale v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, 303 U. S. 613, 58 Sup. Ct. 753, 82 L. Ed. 1050; Hollins v. State of Oklahoma, 295 U. S. 394, 55 Sup. Ct. 784, 79 L. Ed. 1500; Norris v. State of Alabama, 294 U. S. 587, 55 Sup. Ct. 579, 79 L. Ed. 1074; Martin v. State of Texas, 200 U. S. 316, 26 Sup. Ct. 338, 50 L. Ed. 497. The rule is binding on State as well as Federal courts. Ex parte Virginia, 100 U. S…
-
Bishop v. United States, 223 F.2d 582 (D.C. Cir. 1955)…relief. See e. g., Johnson v. Sayre, 1895, 158 U.S. 109, 115-116, 15 S.Ct. 773, 89 L.Ed. 914; Von Moltke v. Gillies, 1948, 332 U.S. 708, 68 S.Ct. 316, 92 L.Ed. 309; cf. United States ex rel. Kassin v. Mulligan, 1935, 295 U.S. 396, 402, 55 S.Ct. 781, 79 LEd. 1501.…
-
United States v. Luxenberg, 374 F.2d 241 (6th Cir. 1967)…F. 2d 798, cert. den. 368 U.S. 933, 82 S.Ct. 371, 7 L.Ed.2d 196, rehearing den. 368 U.S. 962, 82 S.Ct. 401, 7 L.Ed.2d 393; Boone v. United States, 280 F. 2d 911 (C.A.6). See also, United States ex rel. Kassin v. Mulligan, 295 U.S. 396, 55 S.Ct. 781, 79 L.Ed. 1501; Goldsby v. United States, 160 U.S. 70, 16 5. Ct. 216, 40 L.Ed. 343. Defendant Luxenberg assigns as error the failure of the trial judge to grant his motion for a directed verdict at the close of the government’s case and defendant Zimmerman assign…
Previewing 3 of 32 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence