DIGIOVANNI ET AL.
v.
CAMDEN FIRE INSURANCE ASSN

U.S. | 1936-05-20
No. 886
295 U.S. 728 Supreme Court of the United States (1936) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Legg v. ST. John, 296 U.S. 489 (U.S. 1936)
    …in the decision; the bankrupt sought review; The District Court confirmed the referee’s order; and its judgment was affirmed [*492] by the Circuit Court of Appeals. 76 F. (2d) 841. This Court granted certiorari, conflict in decisions being alleged. 295 U. S. 728. The bankrupt contends that the “Supplementary Contract” covering disability is not a separate and distinct contract, but an integral part of the life insurance policy; that the obligation to pay disability benefits is insurance within the meaning…
  • Home Indem. Co. of N.Y. v. Peters, 86 F.2d 916 (5th Cir. 1936)
    …nds alleged. Each especially pleaded that Peters was not and never had been insane, and that the policy had been duly and properly issued and that no grounds for its cancellation existed. The District Judge thought Di Giovanni v. Camden Ins. Ass’n, 295 U.S. 728, 55 S. Ct. 834, 79 L.Ed. 1678, and Enelow v. New York Life Ins. Co., 293 U.S. 379, 384, 55 S.Ct. 310, 312, 79 L.Ed. 440, controlling. In a memorandum opinion he held that the bill should be dismissed for want of equitable grounds for taking jurisdic…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw