BORAX CONSOLIDATED, LTD., ET AL.
v.
LOS ANGELES

U.S. | 1935-06-03
No. 918
295 U.S. 729 Supreme Court of the United States (1935) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Miller v. Irving Tr. Co. in Bankr., 296 U.S. 256 (U.S. 1935)
    …n petitioner’s motion, post, p. 658. The decision in the case now before us conflicts with that of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Lloyd Investment Co. v. Schmidt, 66 F. (2d) 371. To resolve the conflict we granted this writ. 295 U. S. 729. The lease covered a store building in Newark, New Jersey, and w,as for a term of ten years commencing August 1, 1928. The lessee occupied the premises until April 27, 1932, when, by the above named court, an equity receiver w,as appointed for it.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw