DANIEL ET AL.
v.
LAYTON ET AL.
DANIEL ET AL.
LAYTON ET AL.
295 U.S. 753
Supreme Court of the United States (1935)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Rubin, 378 F.2d 104 (3d Cir. 1967)…v. Blythe, 354'F. 2d 83 (C.A.2, 1965). Once the citation is before the district court, it has been said that its power to punish is no broader than its power in other cases. See Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co., 76 F. 2d 209 (C.A.5), cert. denied, 295 U.S. 753, 55 S.Ct. 834, 79 L.Ed. 1697 (1935). The procedure is the same as in regular contempt cases. 1 Collier, Bankruptcy If 2.58 [3]; 9 Remington, Bankruptcy §§ 3546 at n. 4, 3554. The only distinction between contempts of the district court and contempts…
-
In re Hipp, Inc. v. Oles, 895 F.2d 1503 (5th Cir. 1990)…urts” in a generic sense not defined strictly by Article III. Prior to the 1978 Act, several cases held that the bankruptcy courts had inherent contempt powers, see, e.g., Isaacs v. Hobbs Tie & Timber Co., 76 F. 2d 209, 212 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 295 U.S. 753, 55 S.Ct. 834, 79 L.Ed. 1697 (1935); Boyd v. Glucklich, 116 F. 131, 135 (8th Cir.1902), but the “bankruptcy courts” that those cases referred to were clearly the Article III district courts sitting in bankruptcy, which had bankruptcy referees assign…
-
Weber Flour Mills Co. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 82 F.2d 764 (10th Cir. 1936)…ed to deduct such loss. See Paul & Mertens, Law of Federal Taxation, vol. 3, § 27.03; New Colonial Ice Co. v. Commissioner, supra; Pennsylvania Co. v. Commissioner, supra; McLaughlin v. Purity Investment Co. (C.C.A.9) 75 F.(2d) 30, certiorari denied 295 U.S. 753, 55 S.Ct. 834, 79 L.Ed. 1697; General Finance Co. of Philadelphia v. Commissioner, 32 B.T.A. 949. The old corporation passed out of existence when its charter was forfeited. It no. longer had any corporate rights or prerogatives. Four-S-Razor Co. v…