INTERNATIONAL SHOE CO.

v.

RUBINS ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Yamamoto v. Kazuo Omiya, 564 F.2d 1319 (9th Cir. 1977)
  …hen the solicitor of the proxies is the company itself. We need only hold that more must be shown than the mere appearance of a buyer’s name in the proxy materials. . Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. Burroughs, 75 F. 2d 855 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 295 U.S. 758, 55 S.Ct. 915, 79 L.Ed. 1700 (1935); City Stores Co. v. Ammerman, 266 F.Supp. 766 (D.D.C. 1967), aff'd, 129 U.S.App.D.C. 325, 394 F. 2d 950 (1968). We attach no special significance to the fact that the disputed transaction involved the sale of rea…
• Lumbermens Mut. Ins. Co. v. Bowman, 313 F.2d 381 (10th Cir. 1963)
  …ason to issue a new policy. . 3 Couch on Insurance 2d, § 26:54, p.p. 519-520. Accord: Lumbermens Mut. Ins. Co. v. Slide Rule & Scale Eng. Co., 7 Cir., 177 F. 2d 305. Cf. Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. Burroughs, 10 Cir., 75 F. 2d 855, cert. denied, 295 U.S. 758, 55 S.Ct. 915, 79 L.Ed. 1700. . Accord: South Second Livestock Auction, Inc., v. Roberts, 69 N.M. 155, 364 P. 2d 859; Houtz v. General Bonding & Insurance Co., 10 Cir., 235 F. 2d 591; McNutt Oil & Refining Co. v. Mimbres Valley Bank, 10 Cir., 174 F…