EVERETT MILLS, INC.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• In re Chicago Rapid Transit Co. Chicago Junction R. Co. v. Sprague, 129 F.2d 1 (7th Cir. 1942)
  …76 L.Ed. 342; New York v. United States, 257 U.S. 591, 42 S.Ct. 239, 66 L.Ed. 385; American Brake Shoe & Foundry Co. v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co., D.C., 10 F.Supp. 512; affirmed, 2 Cir., 76 F. 2d 1002, certiorari denied New York City v. Murray, 295 U.S. 760, 55 S.Ct. 923, 79 L.Ed. 1702. Congress has not thus far attempted to reach the utmost horizon of the power. Under existing bankruptcy legislation, contractual relationships and obligations may be discharged; under certain circumstances, judgments v…
• John F. Jelke Co. v. Smietanka, 86 F.2d 470 (7th Cir. 1936)
  …t the validity of such action, was bound to begin his suit within two years from that date. IJaving failed to do so, his action, as the District Court held, must fail. Pratt & Whitney Co. v. United States, 6 F.Supp. 574 (Ct. Cl.), certiorari denied, 295 U.S. 760, 55 S.Ct. 919, 79 L.Ed. 1702; Arthur C. Harvey Co. v. Malley, 60 F.(2d) 97 (C.C.A. 1). In Bonwit Teller & Co. v. United States, 283 U.S. 258, 51 S.Ct. 395, 75 L. Ed. 1018, relied upon by appellee, the court’s conclusion was that a suit based upon d…
• Edwards v. Malley, 109 F.2d 640 (1st Cir. 1940)
  …ne v. United States, 2 Cir., 1939, 105 F. 2d 955, 956, 957; John F. Jelke Co. v. Smietanka, 7 Cir., 1936, 86 F. 2d 470, 473; Pratt & Whitney Co. v. United States, Ct.Cl. 1934, 6 F.Supp. 574; Id., Ct.Cl., 1935,10 F.Supp. 148, certiorari denied, 1935, 295 U.S. 760, 55 S.Ct. 919, 79 L.Ed. 1702. Cf. United States v. Michel, 1931, 282 U.S. 656, 659, 51 S.Ct. 284, 75 L.Ed. 598. Even if a notice were required of disallowance or other final adjustment of the claim, it may fairly be urged that the certificate of o…