UNITED STATES
v.
KESTERSON ET AL.
Mr. Justice Roberts delivered the opinion of the Court.
This case, like the case next preceding, involves the validity of § 701 of the Revenue Act of 1926. The Circuit Court of Appeals reversed judgments of conviction under an indictment charging engaging in the business of a retail liquor dealer contrary to the laws of Oklahoma on August 17, 1934. 8 F. Supp. 680; 76 F. (2d) 913.
For the reasons given in the opinion in the other case the judgment is Affirmed.
Mr. Justice Brandéis, Mr. Justice Stone and Mr. Justice Cardozo dissent for the reasons stated in Mr. Justice Cardozo’s opinion in United States v. Constantine, ante, p. 287.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (39 total)
-
Trauger v. A.J. Spagnol Lumber Co., Inc., 442 So. 2d 182 (Fla. 1983)…ree. The full faith and credit clause is part of an intricate constitutional scheme to weld the states of this country into a strong union. As expressed by the United States Supreme Court in Milwaukee County v. M.E. White Co., 296 U.S. 268, 276-77, 56 S.Ct. 229, 234, 80 L.Ed. 220 (1935): The very purpose of the full faith and credit clause was to alter the status of the several states as independent foreign sovereignties, each free to ignore obligations created under the laws or by the judicial proceeding…
-
Ledoux-Nottingham v. Downs, 210 So. 3d 1217 (Fla. 2017)…es as independent foreign sovereignties, each free to ignore obligations created under the laws or by the judicial proceedings of the others, and to make them integral parts of a single nation.” Milwaukee County v. M.E. White Co., 296 U.S. 268, 277, 56 S.Ct. 229, 80 L.Ed. 220 (1935); see also Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Hunt, 320 U.S. 430, 439, 64 S.Ct. 208, 88 L.Ed. 149 (1943) (noting that “the clear purpose of the full faith and credit clause” was to establish the principle that “a litigation once pursued t…
-
M & R Invs. v. Hacker, 511 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987)…ired to be given to such a judgment outside the state of its rendition. [Citation omitted]. The constitutional command requires a state to enforce a judgment of a sister, state for its taxes, Milwaukee County v. N.E. White Co., supra [296 U.S. 268, 56 S.Ct. 229, 80 L.Ed. 220 (1935)], or for a gambling debt, Fauntleroy v. Lum, supra, or for damages for wrongful death, Kenney v. Supreme Lodge, supra [252 U.S. 411, 40 S.Ct. 371, 64 L.Ed. 638 (1920)], although the suit in which the judgment was obtained could…
Previewing 3 of 39 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Kesterson v. United States, 76 F.2d 913 (10th Cir. 1935)