VILLA ET AL.
v.
VAN SCHAICK, SUPERINTENDENT OF INSURANCE

U.S. | 1935-10-25
No. 27
296 U.S. 544 Supreme Court of the United States (1935) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a properly presented federal question. Lynch v. New York, 293 U. S. 52.

Mr. Hartwell Cabell, with whom Mr. Asa B. Kellogg was on the brief, for appellants.

Messrs. Louis H. Pink, Walter B. Herendeen, and Benjamin Potoker were on the brief for appellee.

Mr. John J. Bennett, Jr., Attorney General of New York, Mr. Henry Epstein, Solicitor General, and Mr. Joseph A. McLaughlin, Assistant Attorney General, were on the brief for the Industrial Commissioner of New York, intervener, in support of the position of appellee.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Villa v. Van Schaick, 299 U.S. 152 (U.S. 1936)
    …ted to the preference of the New York claimants. The Supreme Court of the State sustained the preference and ordered distribution accordingly. The Court of Appeals affirmed the order. 266 N. Y. 589; 195 N. E. 213. Appeal to this Court was dismissed. 296 U. S. 544. The Court of Appeals amended its remittitur so as to recite that a federal question was presented and necessarily passed upon, in that the court held that § 34 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law of New York was not repugnant to § 2 of Article IV and…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw