CAPITAL ENDOWMENT CO.
v.
OHIO EX REL. BOWEN, SUPERVISOR OF BOND INVESTMENT COMPANIES
CAPITAL ENDOWMENT CO.
OHIO EX REL. BOWEN, SUPERVISOR OF BOND INVESTMENT COMPANIES
296 U.S. 546
Supreme Court of the United States (1935)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motion to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the reason that the judgment sought here to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Enterprise Irrigation Dist. v. Canal Co., 243 U. S. 157, 163— 164; McCoy v. Shaw, 277 U. S. 302, 303; Browne v. Union Pacific B. Co., 267 U. S. 255, 258-259.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 337 U.S. 426 (U.S. 1949)…hereafter the dismissal by district courts, for want of jurisdiction, of attempts to review such reparation orders was summarily affirmed without argument, so definitively had the Standard Oil case settled the matter. Allison & Co. v. United States, 296 U. S. 546, affirming 12 F. Supp. 862; Ashland Coal & Ice Co. v. United States, 325 U. S. 840, affirming 61 F. Supp. 708, decided less than four years ago. In order to recover a money claim of its own, the Government in this case has suddenly shifted a positio…1 / 4
-
Aluminum Co. OF Am. v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n & United States, 553 F.2d 1268 (D.C. Cir. 1977)…6, 3 L.Ed.2d 44 (1958). See also Ashland Coal & Ice Co. v. United States, 61 F.Supp. 708, 711-712 (E.D.Va.), aff’d, 325 U.S. 840, 65 S.Ct. 1573, 89 L.Ed. 1966 (1945); George Allison & Co., Inc. v. United States, 12 F.Supp. 862 (S.D.N.Y.1935), aff’d, 296 U.S. 546, 56 S.Ct. 175, 80 L.Ed. 387 (1936). Under the amendments enacted in 1975, three-judge courts are no longer convened to hear appeals from ICC orders. However, the statutory exception to the Courts of Appeals’ jurisdiction to review such orders track…
-
George Allison & Co., Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Comm'n, 107 F.2d 180 (D.C. Cir. 1939)…reparation in the amounts sued for. Enough has been said to show that the claim in that respect is unfounded, and on that ground we affirm the judgment of the District Court. Affirmed. George Allison & Co. v. United States, D.C., 12 F.Supp. 862. 296 U.S. 546, 56 S.Ct. 175, 80 L.Ed. 387. As stated above, these rates were not in effect until March 17, 1934, but this ease is not concerned with any> shipments made after December 28, 1933. Reparation for shipments between the two dates was awarded to the sa…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Enter. Irrigation Dist. v. Farmers Mut. Canal Co., 243 U.S. 157 (U.S. 1917)
- McCOY v. Shaw, 277 U.S. 302 (U.S. 1928)
- Browne v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 267 U.S. 255 (U.S. 1925)