TEXAS
v.
NEW MEXICO
TEXAS
NEW MEXICO
296 U.S. 547
Supreme Court of the United States (1935)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Int'l Ladies' Garment Workers' Union v. Donnelly Garment Co., 304 U.S. 243 (U.S. 1938)…below has acted without jurisdiction, exercises its appellate jurisdiction to correct the improper action. Gully v. Interstate Natural Gas Co., 292 U. S. 16, 18; Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. Oklahoma Packing Co., 292 U. S. 386, 392; Wall v. McNee, 296 U. S. 547; United States v. Corrick, 298 U. S. 435, 440. As appellants by mistakenly appealing directly to this Court have lost their opportunity to have the decree reviewed on its merits, as the time for appeal to the Circuit Court of Appeals has expired, ou…
-
Wall v. McNEE, 87 F.2d 768 (5th Cir. 1937)…older of bonds made before the date of the act, a three-judge court held the act invalid as impairing the contract in this very case. McNee v. Wall (D.C.) 4 F.Supp. 496. The decision was reversed because the case was not one requiring three judges, 296 U.S. 547, 56 S.Ct. 177, 80 L.Ed. 388, but was cited and followed by the Supreme Court of Florida in First State Savings Bank v. Little River Drainage District, supra. The statutes regulating the collection of- property taxes in Florida are fully stated in…
-
Texas v. New Mexico, 308 U.S. 510 (U.S. 1939)…be reimbursed by the State of New Mexico and the Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District to the extent of one-half of all sums heretofore disbursed by it on account of expenses of the Special Master. (Earlier phases of this litigation are reported in 296 U. S. 547; 297 U. S. 693, 698; 298 U. S. 639, 644; 300 U. S. 645; 302 U. S. 658; 304 U. S. 551.)…