DUPARQUET HUOT & MONEUSE CO. ET AL.
v.
EVANS ET AL.
DUPARQUET HUOT & MONEUSE CO. ET AL.
EVANS ET AL.
296 U.S. 569
Supreme Court of the United States (1935)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Huston v. Iowa Soap Co., 85 F.2d 649 (8th Cir. 1936)…ickert Rice Mills Case was that the funds impounded pendente lite should be paid back to the petitioner. See Los Angeles Soap Co. v. Rogan (D.C.Cal.) 14 F.Supp. 112, 117. It is true that an injunction had previously been granted in the Rickert Case, 296 U.S. 569, 56 S.Ct. 249, 80 L.Ed. 401, pending the determination of the cause on certiorari in the Supreme Court and requiring the tax pendente lite to be impounded in a depository. No reason, however, is assigned for the action taken, and it may have resulte…