INTERNATIONAL AGRICULTURAL CORP. ET AL.

v.

AMTORG TRADING CORP.

Citator

Cited By

• Akzo N.V. v. U.S. Int'l Trade Comm'n, 808 F.2d 1471 (Fed. Cir. 1986)
  …poses of the statute. See, e.g., In re Chain Door Locks, USITC Pub. No. 770 (Apr. 1976), 191 USPQ 272 (USITC 1976); In re Von Clemm, 229 F. 2d 441, 108 USPQ 371 (CCPA 1955); In re Amtorg Trading Corp., 75 F. 2d 826, 24 USPQ 315 (CCPA), cert. denied, 296 U.S. 576, 56 S.Ct. 102, 80 L.Ed. 407 (1935). However, unfair acts, without more, are legally insufficient to support a finding of a § 337 violation. That provision declares unlawful “[u]nfair methods of competition and unfair acts in the importation of arti…
• United States v. Studiengesellschaft Kohle, 670 F.2d 1122 (D.C. Cir. 1981)
  …nfringe the [*1128] patent; it is the unauthorized use of the process that infringes the patent. See, e.g., Koratron Co. v. Lion Uniform, Inc., 449 F. 2d 337, 338 (9th Cir. 1971); In re Amtorg Trading Corp., 75 F. 2d 826 (C.C.P.A.1935), cert. denied 296 U.S. 576, 56 S.Ct. 102, 80 L.Ed. 407 (1935).8 Here the several licenses contained conditions restricting sales by the nonexclusive licensees of the product of the patented process. Such sales would violate the license agreement and therefore expose the selle…
• Sharpe v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 107 F.2d 13 (3d Cir. 1939)
  …erting the tax. But if he acts in time the Commissioner is not bound by his former construction of the law, Burnet v. Porter, 283 U. S. 230, 51 S.Ct. 416, 75 L.Ed. 996; Omaha Baum Iron Store v. United States, Ct.Cl., 8 F.Supp. 703, certiorari denied 296 U.S. 576, 56 S.Ct. 87, 80 L.Ed. 407. The estate tax return was filed on October 9, 1931, and the period of limitation for an additional assessment against the Dixon Estate was three years under Sec. 310 of the Revenue Act of 1926, 26 U.S.C.A. §§ 474(a), 475.…