FLORIDA ASPHALT PAVEMENT MANUFACTURING CO. ET AL.
v.
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ATLANTA

U.S. | 1935-10-14
No. 44
296 U.S. 577 Supreme Court of the United States (1935) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co. v. Sullivan, 617 F.2d 793 (D.C. Cir. 1980)
    …zardous materials. As we stated in our prior memorandum, it is our opinion that the railroad tracks may be considered to be a “facility” under the statute. Munoz v. Porto Rico Ry., Light & Power Co., 74 F. 2d 816, 821 (1st Cir. 1934), cert. denied, 296 U.S. 577, 56 S.Ct. 88, 80 L.Ed. 408 (1935). However, the widely separated derailments specified in the order and the allegation of “widespread safety deficiencies throughout its system” fall far short of supporting the determination required by the statute t…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw