HOLLIDGE
v.
COLONIAL TRUST CO.
HOLLIDGE
COLONIAL TRUST CO.
296 U.S. 581
Supreme Court of the United States (1935)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gillons v. Shell Co. of Cal., 86 F.2d 600 (9th Cir. 1936)…r setting. It must be borne in mind that the decision of the trial court on the subject of laches will not be set aside unless it is palpably wrong. In The Kermit, 76 F.(2d) 363, 367, certiorari denied, Lamborn v. American Ship & Commerce Nav. Co., 296 U.S. 581, 582, 56 S.Ct. 93, 80 L.Ed. 411, we said: “As the decisions indicate, the question of laches is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge, and his decision will not be disturbed on appeal unless it is so clearly wrong as to amount to an a…
-
Morales v. Bull S.S. Co., 279 F.2d 299 (1st Cir. 1960)…d his decision will not be disturbed on appeal unless it is so clearly wrong as to amount to an abuse of discretion.” The Kermit, 9 Cir., 1935, 76 F. 2d 363, 367, certiorari denied sub nom. Lamborn v. American Ship & Commerce Navigation Corp., 1935, 296 U.S. 581, 56 S.Ct. 93, 80 L.Ed. 411. I would affirm.…
-
Old Fort Improvement Co. v. LEA, 89 F.2d 286 (4th Cir. 1937)…ation and the institution of bankruptcy proceedings should be taken into consideration. In this state of the law section 77B was enacted. It was first held constitutional by this court in Campbell v. Alleghany Corp., 75 F.(2d) 947, certiorari denied 296 U.S. 581, 56 S.Ct. 92, 80 L.Ed. 411, and later by the Second Circuit in Re New Rochelle Coal & Lumber Co., 77 F.(2d) 881; see, also, Continental Illinois Nat. Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 294 U.S. 648, 55 S.Ct. 595, 79 L. Ed. 1110. As Jud…