DURELL
v.
PEARSON, RECEIVER

U.S. | 1935-10-14
No. 261
296 U.S. 606 Supreme Court of the United States (1935) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • W. Elec. Co., Inc. v. Hammond, 135 F.2d 283 (1st Cir. 1943)
    …mond and Western Electric but also as between Hammond and the United States, and thus would conclude the whole controversy. General Chemical Co. v. Standard Wholesale Phosphate & Acid Works, Inc., 4 Cir. 1939, 101 F. 2d 178, certiorari denied, 1935, 296 U.S. 606, 56 S.Ct. 122, 80 L.Ed. 430; Norton v. San Jose Fruit-Packing Co., 9 Cir., 1897, 83 F. 512. See Am.L.Inst. Restatement of Judgments, § 96. It is true that a declaratory judgment in favor of Hammond, on the other hand, would not be res judicata as ag…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw