WARD M. CANADAY, INC.,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

U.S. | 1935-10-14
No. 318
296 U.S. 612 Supreme Court of the United States (1935) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Ira B. Miller v. Miller, 423 F.2d 145 (10th Cir. 1970)
    …action for the cancellation of an instrument is an in personam action both under federal law, Harnischfeger Sales Corporation v. National Life Ins. Co., 7 Cir., 72 F. 2d 921, 924, and Putnam v. Ickes, 64 App.D.C. 339, 78 F. 2d 223, 226, cert. denied 296 U.S. 612, 56 S.Ct. 132, 80 L.Ed. 434, and under New Mexico law, State ex rel. Truitt v. District Court of Ninth Judicial District, 44 N.M. 16, 96 P. 2d 710, 714-715, 126 A.L.R. 651. New Mexico has held that a quiet title action is in personam. Ibid.; cf. St…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw