POTTORFF, RECEIVER,

v.

STAFFORD

Citator

Cited By

• Grivas v. Alianza Compania Armadora, S.A., 276 F.2d 822 (2d Cir. 1960)
  …98-99), was not meant to be excluded. However, the Korthinos case supports Judge Dawson’s conclusion, as does The T. F. Oakes, C.O. D.Or.1888, 36 F. 442, 445.5 Weisthoff v. American-Hawaiian S.S. Co., 2 Cir., 79 F. 2d 124, certiorari denied, 1935, 296 U.S. 619, 56 S.Ct. 140, 80 L.Ed. 439, is distinguishable on the grounds that a prior statutory violation during the voyage entitled the libelants to receive their discharge and be paid their wages at New York and that there was no evidence of misconduct such…
• The United States v. Richardson, 889 F.2d 37 (3d Cir. 1989)
  …as of any ... time,” court applying Pennsylvania law stated, " 'warrant of attorney to confess judgment becomes ineffective as soon as the statute of limitations has run against the debt upon which this was based’") (citation omitted), cert. denied, 296 U.S. 619, 56 S.Ct. 140, 80 L.Ed. 440 (1935); Alliance First Nat'l Bank v. Spies, 158 Ohio St. 499, 501, 110 N.E. 2d 483, 484-85 (1953) ("[i]t is well established that a warrant of attorney to confess judgment on an obligation, even if it does contain [a clau…