CHUNG YIM
v.
UNITED STATES

U.S. | 1935-10-21
No. 422
296 U.S. 627 Supreme Court of the United States (1935) Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Humble OIL & Ref. Co. v. SUN OIL Co., 191 F.2d 705 (5th Cir. 1951)
    …15. A court of equity has jurisdiction to prevent the casting of a cloud on the title to property, as well as to remove an existing cloud. Tyler v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co., 5 Cir., 77 F. 2d 802, certiorari denied, Allred v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co., 296 U.S. 627, 663, 56 S.Ct. 149, 80 L.Ed. 445; Eppenauer v. Ohio Oil Co., 5 Cir., 98 F. 2d 524, certiorari denied 306 U.S. 632, 668, 59 S.Ct. 461, 83 L.Ed. 1034; 44 Am. Jur., p. 17, Sec. 17. A lease may be a cloud, which equity has jurisdiction to remove. Robins…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw