QUIGLEY

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. LaSORSA, 480 F.2d 522 (2d Cir. 1973)
  …es Supreme Court in Patton v. United States, 281 U.S. 276, 50 S.Ct. 253, 74 L.Ed. 854 (1930) — the principle that a defendant may not waive his right to a jury trial. See Cahill V. Mayflower Bus Lines, Inc., 77 F. 2d 838, 840 (2 Cir.), cert. denied, 296 U.S. 629, 56 S.Ct. 156, 80 L.Ed. 447 (1935). Inasmuch as the defendants do not claim, and have not shown, that they suffered substantial prejudice from the substitution of judges this claim is without merit. The convictions are affirmed. . This was the d…
• In re Carter, 192 F.2d 15 (D.C. Cir. 1951)
  …b) and 46,18 U.S.C.A. . Fed.R.Crim.P., 5(b) and 46; 62 Stat. 821 (1948), 18 U.S.C.A. § 3141. . La Grotta v. United States, 8 Cir., 1935, 77 F. 2d 673, 103 A.L.R. 527, and cases there cited, certiorari denied sab nom. Quigley v. United States, 1935, 296 U. S. 629, 56 S.Ct. 152, 80 L.Ed. 447. . 1940, 310 U.S. 113, 60 S.Ct. 869, 84 L. Ed. 1108. . Fed.R.Crim.P., 46(c). . Id., 46(e). . Ibid. . 61 Stat. 646 (1947), 6 U.S.C.A. § 8. . 61 Stat. 646 (1947), 6 U.S.C.A. § 6. . Concord Casualty & Surety Co. v. Un…
• Gafford v. Trans-Texas Airways, 299 F.2d 60 (6th Cir. 1962)
  …the absence of Lamb as a witness was never squarely presented to the trial judge. But had it been he would have been entirely within his discretion to allow it or not. See also Kierce v. Central Vermont Ry., Inc., 79 F. 2d 198, C.A. 2, cert. denied 296 U.S. 629, 56 S.Ct. 152, 80 L.Ed. 447. In the matter of this absent witness, counsel for plaintiff claim that the court committed reversible error in misstating the law after interrupting counsel’s argument. After interrupting the argument and telling counse…