KOUTEI SUGAYA

v.

HAFF, DISTRICT DIRECTOR OF IMMIGRATION

Citator

Cited By

• United States ex rel. Ling YEE Suey v. Spar, 149 F.2d 881 (2d Cir. 1945)
  …267 U.S. 228, 45 S.Ct. 257, 69 L.Ed. 585; United States ex rel. Pantano v. Corsi, 2 Cir., 65 F. 2d 322; Ex parte Chow Chok, C.C.N.D.N.Y., 161 F. 627, affirmed 2 Cir., 163 F. 1021; cf., however, Blumen v. Haff, 9 Cir., 78 F. 2d 833, certiorari denied 296 U.S. 644, 56 S.Ct. 248, 80 L.Ed. 458. But on a writ of habeas corpus we can determine only whether petitioners can be lawfully detained; and if sufficient ground for their detention is shown, they are “not to be discharged for defects in the original arrest…
• United States v. Wilfried van Cauwenberghe, 934 F.2d 1048 (9th Cir. 1991)
  …isdiction as a result of his extradition. In making this argument, Van Cauwenberghe places particular reliance upon United States v. Rauscher, 119 U.S. 407, 7 S.Ct. 234, 30 L.Ed. 425 (1886), Blumen v. Haff 78 F. 2d 833, 835 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 296 U.S. 644, 56 S.Ct. 248, 80 L.Ed. 458 (1935), and In re Baruch, 41 F. 472, 474 (C.C.S.D.N.Y.1890). Whether Van Cauwenberghe’s immunity argument is valid or not is irrelevant in the [*1058] context of this case. The personal jurisdiction issue Van Cauwenbergh…
• DEL Guercio v. Delgadillo, 159 F.2d 130 (9th Cir. 1947)
  …held that a fisherman-alien, shipwrecked and ordered by his captain to land on an island of Mexico, upon subsequently returning to the United States made an entry within § 19(a), supra. And in Blumen v. Half, 9 Cir., 78 F. 2d 833, certiorari denied 296 U.S. 644, 56 S.Ct. 248, 80 L.Ed. 458, we held that aliens brought to this country by extradition from England had “entered” within the meaning of that section. Appellee argues these cases are distinguishable because the aliens involved were not hazarding th…