JOHN LOUIS DAVIS, PETITIONER,
v.
U. S. PHOSPHORIC PRODUCTS, MANHATTAN FIRE & MARINE INSURANCE CO., AND FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, RESPONDENTS

Fla. | 1965-03-31
No. 33924
DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THORN-AL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.
173 So. 2d 443 Florida Supreme Court (1965) Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date October 19, 1964.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

DREW, C. J., and ROBERTS, THORN-AL, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Salfi v. Fla. Dev. Comm'n, 223 So. 2d 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 1969)
    …PER CURIAM. Affirmed on authority of State v. Jacksonville Expressway Authority, Fla., 160 So. 2d 513; State v. City of Titusville, Fla., 173 So. 2d 443; and Fair v. City of Tampa, Fla., 175 So. 2d 197. WIGGINTON, C. J., and CARROLL, DONALD K., and SPECTOR, JJ-, concur.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw