GENERAL MOTORS CORP.

v.

PREFERRED ELECTRIC & WIRE CORP.

Citator

Cited By

• Hendrick v. CSX Transp., Inc., 575 So. 2d 709 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)
  …35 U.S. 520, 69 S.Ct. 275, 93 L.Ed 208 (1949); Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. v. Goneau, 269 U.S. 406, 46 S.Ct. 129, 70 L.Ed. 335 (1926); Chicago, M. St. P. & Pac. R. Co. v. Goldhammer, 79 F. 2d 272 (8th Cir.1935) cert. denied, 296 U.S. 655, 56 S.Ct. 382, 80 L.Ed. 467 (1936); McCalley v. Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co., 265 So. 2d 11 (Fla.1972); and Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Jackson, 256 So. 2d 568 (Fla. 1st DCA 1971). The jury could have determined that the railroad operat…
• United States v. Schaffer, 266 F.2d 435 (2d Cir. 1959)
  …tial element of the crime charged, prior instances of a similar pattern of operation are relevant to establish scienter. See 2 Wigmore, Evidence, Section 325 (3d Ed. 1940); United States v. Brand, 2 Cir., 1935, 79 F. 2d 605, certiorari denied, 1936, 296 U.S. 655, 56 S.Ct. 381, 80 L.Ed. 466. The proof as to these prior dealings showed the same use of manufacturers’ invoices and the same substantial discounts from the manufacturers’ wholesale prices as did the evidence concerning the transactions alleged in…
• United States v. Huddleston, 811 F.2d 974 (6th Cir. 1987)
  …ure: Evidence § 5054, at 269 (1977).” 582 F. 2d 898, 910 n. 13 & 913 (5th Cir.1978). The logic of the en banc decision in Beechum corresponds to that applied by Judge Learned Hand in United States v. Brand, 79 F. 2d 605 (2d Cir.1935), cert. denied, 296 U.S. 655, 56 S.Ct. 381, 80 L.Ed. 466 (1936). In Brand, which affirmed a conviction for transporting a stolen automobile, the court rejected the doctrine “that evidence of the receipt of other stolen goods is not admissible unless the prosecution proves that…