LYNCH

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Brown v. C. D. Mallory & Co., 122 F.2d 98 (3d Cir. 1941)
  …speaks of the Jones Act as a “statutory” extension of a seaman’s remedies at law. See Peters v. Detroit & Cleveland Nav. Co., D.C., 24 F. 2d 454; Summerall v. United Fruit Co., D.C., 11 F.Supp. 963, affirmed 2 Cir., 80 F. 2d 1020, certiorari denied 298 U.S. 658, 56 S.Ct. 680, 80 L.Ed. 1884; Olafson v. Waterman Steamship Corp., D.C., 281 F. 194; Barrington v. Pacific Steamship Co., D.C., 282 F. 900; Leon v. United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corp., D.C., 286 F. 681; Caceres v. United States Shippi…
• Munro v. United States, 89 F.2d 614 (2d Cir. 1937)
  …ction and operates as a bar to judgment without being pleaded. Finn v. United States, 123 U.S. 227, 8 [*617] S.Ct. 82, 31 L.Ed. 128. It may not be abrogated by estoppel, nor waived. Lynch v. United States, 80 F.(2d) 418 (C.C.A. 5), certiorari denied 298 U.S. 658, 56 S. Ct. 683, 80 L.Ed. 1384; United States v. Trollinger, 81 F.(2d) 167 (C.C.A.4); United States v. Valndza, 81 F.(2d) 615 (C.C.A.6); Henry v. United States, 15 F. Supp. 651 (D.C.M.D.Pa.); Spencer v. United States, 14 F.Supp. 46 (D.C.D.Mass.). The…
• Armour & Co. v. Alton R. Co., 111 F.2d 913 (7th Cir. 1940)
  …sty & Sons, 255 U.S. 252, 41 S.Ct. 269, 65 L.Ed. 614; Interstate Commerce Commission v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co., 234 U.S. 294, 34 S.Ct. 814, 58 L.Ed. 1319, and Aron v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 2 Cir., 80 F. 2d 100, 103 A.L.R. 1367, certiorari denied 298 U.S. 658, 56 S.Ct. 680, 80 L.Ed. 1384. In the Atchison Ry. case, 295 U.S. 193, 195, 199, 55 S.Ct. 748, 79 L.Ed. 1382, the Supreme Court described the collection of the yardage charge as a “long existing practice,” and stated the case to be whether “the pract…