CARNAHAN

v.

MISSOURI-KANSAS-TEXAS RY. CO.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. KAY, 89 F.2d 19 (2d Cir. 1937)
  …s not contend otherwise. The bill of exceptions was not settled and filed until October, 1936. The power to grant an extension resided with the trial judge, subject only to specific exceptions [U. S. v. Adamowicz, 82 F.(2d) 288 (C.C.A.2), cert. den. 298 U.S. 664, 56 S.Ct. 748, 80 L.Ed. 1388], and this pow*er could only be exercised within a period of thirty days after taking the appeal [U. S. v. Ray, 86 F.(2d) 942 (C.C.A.2), cert, granted Feb. 8, 1937, 57 S.Ct. 435, 81 L.Ed. -]. This is the requirement of R…
• United States v. Shapiro, 113 F.2d 891 (2d Cir. 1940)
  …ion. To pay money to a fugitive so that he may shelter, feed or hide himself is not within the accepted meanings of to “harbor or conceal” him. The government relies upon the case of Piquett v. United States, 7 Cir., 81 F. 2d 75, certiorari denied, 298 U.S. 664, 56 S.Ct. 749, 80 L.Ed. 1388. There the conspirators performed a surgical operation upon the person of a fugitive from justice so as to obliterate his finger prints and change his facial appearance. This was held to be a conspiracy to conceal the fu…