MOYERMAN

v.

HALE, TRUSTEE

Citator

Cited By

• Clairol, Inc. v. Boston Disc. Ctr. OF Berkley, Inc., 608 F.2d 1114 (6th Cir. 1979)
  …gan law, proof of “palming off” was not essential to a claim of unfair competition, although it was one of the more common forms of deception banned by the rule. In Motor Improvements, Inc. v. AC Spark Plug Co., 80 F. 2d 385 (6th Cir.) cert. denied, 298 U.S. 671, 56 S.Ct. 939, 80 [*1119] L.Ed. 1394 (1936), defendant was charged with unfair competition under Michigan law in marketing an oil filter which, although not represented to be a product of the plaintiff, was misrepresented as having the same qualitie…
• Dwain Love v. The NEW York Times Co., 691 F.2d 261 (6th Cir. 1982)
  …held to be the essence of the wrong” [citations omitted] [but] “it is not the sole method, certainly not the sole ground, for equitable intervention .... ” Motor Improvements, Inc. v. A.C. Sparg Plug Co., 80 F. 2d 385, 386 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 298 U.S. 671, 56 S.Ct. 939, 80 L.Ed. 1394 (1936) quoted in Clairol, Inc. v. Boston Discount Center of Berkley, Inc., 608 F. 2d 1114 (6th Cir. 1979). In his decision, the District Judge relied primarily upon Michigan law in this diversity case citing such cases…