ALLEN ET AL.

v.

GEORGIAN HOTEL CORP. ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• Timely Prods. Corp. v. Arron, 523 F.2d 288 (2d Cir. 1975)
  …is also the relationship between partners or other joint venturers.” Among the cases applying this rule are Smith v. Dravo Corp., 203 F. 2d 369, 376 (7th Cir. 1953), and Hoeltke v. C. M. Kemp Mfg. Co., 80 F. 2d 912, 922-23 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 298 U.S. 673, 56 S.Ct. 938, 80 L.Ed. 1395 (1936). See also R. Milgrim, Trade Secrets, § 5.03[7] (1975) [hereinafter Milgrim], The District Court’s conclusion that patentable subject matter cannot be a trade secret was based upon a misapplication of the ruling o…
• Engelhard Indus., Inc. v. Research Instrumental Corp., 324 F.2d 347 (9th Cir. 1963)
  …ges resulting therefrom, not under the patent statutes, but upon the principle that equity will not permit one to unjustly enrich himself at the expense of another.” Hoeltke v. C. M. Kemp Mfg. Co., 80 F. 2d 912, 922-923 (4th Cir. 1936) cert. denied, 298 U.S. 673, 56 S.Ct. 938, 80 L.Ed. 1395, approved and followed by this Circuit in Filtex Corp. v. Amen Atiyeh, 216 F. 2d 443 (9th Cir. 1954). And a claim for unfair competition continues to exist even though the trade secrets are thereafter disclosed in a pate…
• Servo Corp. OF Am. v. Gen. Elec. Co., 337 F.2d 716 (4th Cir. 1964)
  …t of damages.7 This court has applied the rationale of the Booth case to several cases arising in this Circuit. Chesapeake & O. Ry. v. Kaltenbach, 95 F. 2d 801 (4 Cir. 1938); Hoeltke v. C. M. Kemp Mfg. Co., 80 F. 2d 912 (4 Cir. 1935), cert. denied, 298 U.S. 673, 56 S.Ct. 938, 80 L.Ed. 1395 (1936). Both involved claims for damages for the appropriation of commercial devices, in breach of confidence, prior to the issuance of a patent. As we said in Hoeltke v. C. M. Kemp Mfg. Co., supra, 80 F. 2d at 922-23:…