COSSACK

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Texas v. Florida, 306 U.S. 398 (U.S. 1939)
  …S. 580; Hill v. Martin, 296 U. S. 393; Dorrance’s Estate, 309 Pa. 151; 163 A. 303, certiorari denied, 287 U. S. 660, 288 U. S. 617; In re Dorrance, 115 N. J. Eq. 268; 170 A. 601; Dorrance v. Martin, 116 N. J. Law 362; 184 A. 743, certiorari denied, 298 U. S. 678. Cf. Matter of Trowbridge, 266 N. Y. 283; 194 N. E. 756. In addition the facts most essential to establishing that attitude and relationship of person to place which constitute domicile were in this case obscured by numerous self-serving statements…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• MAY v. Anderson, 345 U.S. 528 (U.S. 1953)
  …in point here. See, e. g., Fall v. Eastin, 215 U. S. 1. American Law Institute, Restatement, Conflict of Laws (1934), §§ 117, 144-147. Cf. Curry v. McCanless, 307 U. S. 357; State Tax Commission v. Aldrich, 316 U. S. 174; the Dorrance litigation, 298 U. S. 678, 115 N. J. Eq. 268, 170 A. 601, 309 Pa. 151, 163 A. 303. See Goodrich, Custody of Children in Divorce Suits, 7 Corn. L. Q. 1. Harris v. Balk, 198 U. S. 215; Thompson v. Whitman, 18 Wall. 457. Pennoyer v. Neff, 95 U. S. 714.…
• State Tax Comm'n of Utah v. Aldrich, 316 U.S. 174 (U.S. 1942)
  …y Trust Co. v. Riley, 302 U. S. 292; New Jersey v. Pennsylvania, 287 U. S. 580; Dorrance v. Pennsylvania, 287 U. S. 660 and 288 U. S. 617, certiorari denied to review Dorrance’s Estate, 309 Pa. 151; Hill v. Martin, 296 U. S. 393; Dorrance v. Martin, 298 U. S. 678, certiorari denied to review Dorrance v. Thayer-Martin, 116 N. J. L. 362; Sargent and Tweed, Death and Taxes are Certain—But What of Domicile?, 53 Harvard L. Rev. 68; cf. Treinies v. Sunshine Mining Co., 308 U. S. 66. U. S. Treasury Statistics of I…