FREY & HORGAN CORPORATION
v.
SUPERIOR COURT ET AL.
FREY & HORGAN CORPORATION
SUPERIOR COURT ET AL.
298 U.S. 684
Supreme Court of the United States (1936)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
The S. S. Black Gull v. Am. Diamond Lines, Inc., 90 F.2d 619 (2d Cir. 1937)…the High Seas by Wrongful Act” (46 U.S.C. § 761 etc., 46 U.S.C.A. §>61 et seq.). We held appellants liable for damages. Peterson v. United N. Y. Sandy Hook Pilots Asso. (C.C.A.) 82 F.(2d) 758, cert. denied, American Diamond Lines, Inc., v. Peterson, 298 U.S. 684, 56 S.Ct. 954, 80 L.Ed. 1404. His only child,, a daughter, was awarded $6,000. Appellants contend the award to the widow is excessive. The deceased was 49 years old a.t the time of his death in 1933 and his wife 39. He was a Sandy Hook pilot. They…
-
Pollard v. Seas Shipping Co., Inc., 146 F.2d 875 (2d Cir. 1945)…ecedent, based on his loss and suffering, and one by the personal representative for loss of support of the beneficiary. Defendant relies on our decision in The Black Gull, 2 Cir., 82 F. 2d 758, certiorari denied American Diamond Lines v. Peterson, 298 U.S. 684, 56 S.Ct. 954, 80 L.Ed. 1404; but we there expressly pointed to these two rights of action and held only as to the claim for the deceased’s [*878] pain and suffering' before his death that the mere fact of drowning was insufficient to establish plai…