LASKA

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Examining Bd. of Eng'rs v. Flores de Otero, 426 U.S. 572 (U.S. 1976)
  …ny statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any . . . Territory ... of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws.” See Munoz v. Porto Rico Ry. Light & Power Co., 83 F. 2d 262, 26A-266 (CA1), cert. denied, 298 U. S. 689 (1936). The jurisdictional provision of the Act, referring to “all cases cognizable in the district courts of the United States,” remained in effect until 1948. At that time Congress, in the course of a major revision of the Judicial Code, placed t…
• Feguer v. United States, 302 F.2d 214 (8th Cir. 1962)
  …titute reversible error. But this requirement that closing comment be kept within the record and the inferences appropriately drawable therefrom applies to the defense as well. Laska v. United States, 10 Cir., 1936, 82 F. 2d 672, 679-680, cert. den. 298 U.S. 689, 56 S.Ct. 957, 80 L.Ed. 1407; Holmes v. United States, 1948, 84 U.S.App.D.C. 168, 171 F. 2d 1022, 1023-1024. We therefore find no error in the trial court’s restraint of defense counsel as to the remarks in question or in the court’s manner of so do…
• Jones v. United States, 251 F.2d 288 (10th Cir. 1958)
  …stence of the conspiracy, agrees to become a party, and with that knowledge commits some act in furtherance thereof. United States v. Falcone, 311 U.S. 205, 61 S.Ct. 204, 85 L.Ed. 128; Laska v. United States, 10 Cir., 82 F. 2d 672, certiorari denied 298 U.S. 689, 56 S.Ct. 957, 80 L.Ed. 1407; Skelly v. United States, 10 Cir., 76 F. 2d 483, certiorari denied 295 U.S. 757, 55 S.Ct. 914, 79 L.Ed. 1699; Booth v. United States, 10 Cir., 57 F. 2d 192. This knowledge and participation may be inferred from the circu…