EASTMAN

v.

OHIO

Citator

Cited By

• In re Whittington, 391 U.S. 341 (U.S. 1968)
  …joins, dissenting. I would dismiss this case because the determination of delinquency which we have before us is not a final judgment within our appellate jurisdiction over proceedings in state courts. 28 U. S. C. § 1257. Eastman [*345] v. Ohio, 299 U. S. 505 (1936); Polakow’s Realty Experts, Inc. v. Alabama, 319 U. S. 750 (1943); see Berman v. United States, 302 U. S. 211, 212 (1937); Edwards v. California, 314 U. S. 160, 171 (1941); R. Stern & E. Gressman, Supreme Court Practice § 3-15 (3d ed. 1962) ;…
• Horsley v. Alvis, 281 F.2d 440 (6th Cir. 1960)
  …length. The following is found at pages 417, 418 of 110 N.E. 2d: “In Ohio, all crimes are statutory. Municipal Court of Toledo v. State ex rel. Platter, 126 Ohio St. 103, 184 N.E. 1; Eastman v. State, 131 Ohio St. 1, 1 N.E. 2d 140, appeal dismissed 299 U.S. 505, 57 S.Ct. 21, 81 L.Ed. 374; State v. Fremont Lodge, Loyal Order of Moose, 151 Ohio St. 19, 84 N.E. 2d 498. The elements necessary to constitute the crime must be gathered wholly from the statute and the crime must be described within the terms of th…
• Arceneaux v. Louisiana, 376 U.S. 336 (U.S. 1964)
  …upreme Court can only be the order recalling the order for a preliminary hearing. Under our decisions in the criminal field, such denial of intermediate relief in state criminal cases is similar to an order overruling a plea in bar (Eastman v. Ohio, 299 U. S. 505) or overruling a demurrer to an indictment (Polakow’s Realty Experts v. Alabama, 319 U. S. 750). Hence under 28 U. S. C. § 1257, denial of the preliminary hearing in a vagrancy case of this character is not a “final” judgment. We therefore dismiss t…

Authorities Cited

• Heike v. United States, 217 U.S. 423 (U.S. 1910)
• Rankin v. The State, 11 Wall. 380 (U.S. 1870)