SKIPPER
v.
SCHUMACHER, SHERIFF
SKIPPER
SCHUMACHER, SHERIFF
299 U.S. 507
Supreme Court of the United States (1936)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 28 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motion for leave to file amended statement as to jurisdiction is granted. The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Seattle, R. & S. Ry. v. Linhoff, 231 U. S. 568, 570; Enterprise Irrigation District v. Canal Co., 243 U. S. 157, 165, 166; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U. S 312, 316, 317; American Railway Express Co. v. Kentucky, 273 U. S. 269, 272, 273; Secor v. Fulton, 293 U. S.
517. Insofar as the papers whereon the appeal was allowed seek review of the rulings of the Supreme Court of Florida upon questions of the asserted denial of rights under the Federal Constitution not involving the validity of any statute of the State, such papers are treated as a petition for writ of certiorari (§ 237 (c), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925, 43 Stat. 936, 938), and certiorari is denied.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (14 total)
-
Henderson v. Antonacci, 62 So. 2d 5 (Fla. 1952)…d and substantial reason to make such laws operate only upon certain classes rather than generally upon all. State ex rel. Pennington v. Quigg, 94 Fla. 1056, 114 So. 859; Mayo v. Polk Co., 124 Fla. 534, 169 So. 41, appeal dismissed Polk Co. v. Mayo, 299 U.S. 507, 57 S.Ct. 39, 81 L.Ed. 376; Crandon v. Hazlett, 157 Fla. 574, 26 So. 2d 638; Ex parte Jentzsch, 112 Cal. 468, 44 P. 803, 32 L.R.A. 664; City of Denver v. Bach, 26 Colo. 530, 58 P. 1089, 46 L.R.A. 848. It^is not suggested that the parties who work o…
-
United Yacht Brokers, Inc. v. Gillespie, 377 So. 2d 668 (Fla. 1979)…rness upon practically all persons similarly situated, so that the governmental authority be not arbitrarily exercised to injure the substantial rights of or to oppress any person. . Accord, Mayo v. Polk, 124 Fla. 534, 169 So. 41, appeal dismissed, 299 U.S. 507, 57 S.Ct. 39, 81 L.Ed. 376 (1936). Finally, to accept United’s position would virtually require that all brokers of all commodities must be regulated identically. This is not required, and, accordingly, we find that section 537.05(2) is a reasonabl…
-
Charley F. Ison v. Rollin W. Zimmerman, 372 So. 2d 431 (Fla. 1979)…nts. King Kole, Inc. v. Bryant, supra. As a corollary, it is generally accepted that the principle that expression of one thing is the exclusion of all others does not apply to titles. Mayo v. Polk Company, 124 Fla. 534, 169 So. 41 appeal dismissed, 299 U.S. 507, 57 S.Ct. 39, 81 L.Ed. 376 (1936), J. Sutherland, 1A Statutes and Statutory Construction § 18.04 (4th ed. C. Sands 1972). Since we have determined chapter 67-1149 to be a constitutional act despite both the substantive and formal challenges raised,…
Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U.S. 312 (U.S. 1926)
- Enter. Irrigation Dist. v. Farmers Mut. Canal Co., 243 U.S. 157 (U.S. 1917)
- Am. Ry. Express Co. v. Kentucky, 273 U.S. 269 (U.S. 1927)
- Seattle v. State of Wash., 231 U.S. 568 (U.S. 1913)
- Secor v. Fulton, 293 U.S. 517 (U.S. 1934)