POLK COMPANY
v.
MAYO, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE
POLK COMPANY
MAYO, COMMISSIONER OF AGRICULTURE
299 U.S. 507
Supreme Court of the United States (1936)
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motion for leave to amend the statement as to jurisdiction is granted. The appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Gundling v. Chicago, 177 U. S. 183, 188; Payne v. Kansas, 248 U. S. 112; Arnold v. Hanna, 276 U. S. 591; cf. Sligh v. Kirkwood, 237 U. S. 52, 61, 62.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Gundling v. Chicago, 177 U.S. 183 (U.S. 1900)
- Sligh v. Kirkwood, 237 U.S. 52 (U.S. 1915)
- Payne v. State of Kan. Ex rel. Brewster, 248 U.S. 112 (U.S. 1918)