TORINUS
v.
JOHNSON ET AL.
TORINUS
JOHNSON ET AL.
299 U.S. 508
Supreme Court of the United States (1936)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Tappan v. Merchants’ National Bank, 19 Wall. 490, 505; Florida Central R. Co. v. Reynolds, 183 U. S. 471, 480-481; White River Co. v. Arkansas, 279 U. S. 692, 696-699.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Burton v. Goodlett, 480 F.2d 983 (5th Cir. 1973)…onstitutional if Burton had been given the choice of the alternatives and if he had received Tate v. Short treatment upon a choice to pay the fines. Reversed and remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith. Reversed and remanded. . 299 U.S. 508, 90 S.Ct. 2232, 26 L.Ed.2d 773 (1970).…
Authorities Cited
- Tappan v. Merchs'. Nat'l Bank, 19 Wall. 490 (U.S. 1873)
- Fla. Cent. & Peninsular R.R. Co. v. Reynolds, 183 U.S. 471 (U.S. 1902)
- White River Lumber Co. v. Arkansas Ex rel. Applegate, 279 U.S. 692 (U.S. 1929)