CONTINENTAL OIL CO.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Leishman v. Associated Wholesale Elec. Co., 318 U.S. 203 (U.S. 1943)
  …or supplement the findings of fact in more than purely formal or mechanical aspects tolls the appeals statute, and that the time for taking an appeal runs from the date of the order disposing of the motion. Cf. Continental Oil Co. v. United States, 299 U. S. 510. The motion was not one for a new trial under Rule 59 and respondent’s argument, based on that premise, that it was not filed in time,4 is not pertinent. The judgment below is Reversed. So far as is here material Rule 52 (b) provides: “Upon moti…
• Gaudiosi v. Mellon, 269 F.2d 873 (3d Cir. 1959)
  …st, of its finality, and its immediate appealability. United States v. Crescent Amusement Co., 1944, 323 U.S. 173, 65 S.Ct. 254, 89 L.Ed. 160, rehearing denied 323 U.S. 818, 65 S.Ct. 437, 89 L.Ed. 650; cf. Continental Oil Co. v. United States, 1936, 299 U.S. 510, 57 S.Ct. 30, 81 L.Ed. 378; Aberlin v. Zisman, 1 Cir., 1957, 244 F. 2d 620, certiorari denied 355 U.S. 857, 78 S.Ct. 84, 2 L.Ed.2d 63. As this Court stated in Healy v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 1950, 181 F. 2d 934, 935: “The District Court, when timely…