WERK ET AL.
v.
LORAIN STREET SAVINGS & TRUST CO. ET AL.
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal from the Ohio Supreme Court in a dispute involving Werk and others against Lorain Street Savings & Trust Company, finding that no substantial federal constitutional question challenging the validity of an Ohio statute had been properly presented, and denying certiorari as to other constitutional claims that did not involve state statute validity.
© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Per Curiam:
The motion of the appellees to dismiss the appeal is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question as to the validity of a statute of the State. (1) Crowell v. Randell, 10 Pet. 368, 392; Railroad Co. v. Rock, 4 Wall. 177, 180; Whitney v. California, 274 U. S. 357, 360. (2) Doty v. Love, 295 U. S. 64. In so far as the papers whereon the appeal was allowed seek a review of the rulings of the Supreme Court of Ohio upon questions of the asserted denial of rights under the Federal Constitution not involving the validity of any statute of the State, such papers are treated as a petition for writ of certiorari, § 237 (c), Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 938), and certiorari is denied.
Mr. Orlin F. Goudy, with whom Mr. Louis W. Gering, Jr., was on the brief, for appellants.
Messrs. James B. Garfield, Arthur D. Baldwin, John W. Bricker, Attorney General of Ohio, and J. Roth Crabbe, Assistant Attorney General, were on the brief for appellees.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357 (U.S. 1927)
- Crowell v. Randell, 10 Pet. 368 (U.S. 1836)
- R.R. Co. v. Rock, 4 Wall. 177 (U.S. 1866)
- Doty v. Love, 295 U.S. 64 (U.S. 1935)