LAURO ET AL.
v.
BARKER ET AL.
LAURO ET AL.
BARKER ET AL.
299 U.S. 521
Supreme Court of the United States (1937)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Per_curiam
Per Curiam:
The motion of the appellees to affirm the judgment is granted, and the judgment is affirmed. (1) Bellingham Bay Co. v. New Whatcom, 172 U. S. 314, 318, 319; Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U. S. 71, 81; Wick v. Chelan Electric Co., 280 U. S. 108, 110, 111. (2) Gilfillan v. Union Canal Co., 109 U. S. 401.
Mr. Henry N. Rapaport, with whom Messrs. Irving S. Rapaport and Robert S. Garson were on the brief, for appellants.
Messrs. Lawrence S. Greenbaum, Benjamin J. Rabin, Theodore S. Jaffin, Benjamin Kaplan, and Maurice Finkelstein were on the brief for appellees.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Gibbs v. Buck, 307 U.S. 66 (U.S. 1939)…bury, 301 U. S. 174, 177; Christopher v. Brusselback, 302 U. S. 500, 505; see, KVOS, Inc. v. Associated Press, 299 U. S. 269, 279. Pope v. Blanton, 10 F. Supp. 15, 18, dismissed per curiam for lack of requisite jurisdictional amount in controversy, 299 U. S. 521; Gavica v. Donaugh, 93 F. 2d 173. Rogers v. Hennepin County, 239 U. S. 621. The complaint appears in the original records of this Court, No. 411, Oct. Term 1915. Cf., Robbins v. Western Auto Ins. Co., 4 F. 2d 249, cert. den., 268 U. S. 698; Woods v…
-
Skiriotes v. Florida, 313 U.S. 69 (U.S. 1941)…§ 102. This Act repealed the Act of Juné 20, 1906, 34 Stat. 313, which' was before this Court in the ease of The Abby Dodge, 223 TJ. S. 166. The bill in this case was dismissed because of the absence of the jurisdictional amount. Pope v. Blanton, 299 U. S. 521. 15 Stat. 73. Act of March 3, 1845, 5 Stat. 742.…
Authorities Cited
- Goodrich v. Ferris, 214 U.S. 71 (U.S. 1909)
- Bellingham BAY & British Columbia R.R. Co. v. New Whatcom, 172 U.S. 314 (U.S. 1899)
- Gilfillan v. Union Canal Co. of Pa., 109 U.S. 401 (U.S. 1883)
- Wick v. Chelan Elec. Co., 280 U.S. 108 (U.S. 1929)