HOLLINGSWORTH, ET AL. VERSUS VIRGINIA
HOLLINGSWORTH, ET AL. VERSUS VIRGINIA
3 Dall. 378
Supreme Court of the United States (1798)
Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 1 L. Ed. 644 · 1798 U.S. LEXIS 145 · SCDB 1798-002
Cited by 26 cases
Opinion of the Court
The Court,
on.the day fucceeding the argument, delivered an unnanimous opinion, that the amendment being confti-tutionaliy adopted, Aere cotild not be exercifed any jurifdiction, in any cafe, paft or future, in which a Rate was fued by the citizens of another Rate, or by citizens, or fubje£ls, of any foreign fíate.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (13 total)
-
Arundel Corp. v. Griffin, 89 Fla. 128 (Fla. 1925)…t had construed the judicial power as extending to such a suit, and its decision was thus overruled. The court itself so understood the effect of the amendment, for, after its adoption, Attorney General Lee, in the case of Hollingsworth v. Virginia, 3 Dall. 378, submitted this question to the court, whether the amendment did, or did not, supersede all suits [*136] depending, as well as prevent the institution of new suits, against any one of the United States, by citizens of another State ? ’ Tilghman and…
-
Collier v. Gray, 116 Fla. 845 (Fla. 1934)…that the section as amended shall be set forth at full length does not apply. The constitutional requirements that bills shall be read on different days or at different times does not apply. See 12 C. J. 693; Hollingsworth v. Virginia, 3 Dallas 378, 1 L. Ed. 644; Oakland Paving Co. v. Hilton, 69 Cal. 479, 11 Pac. Rep. 3; Cooney v. Foote, 142 Ga. 647, 83 S. E. Rep. 537; Ann. Cas. 1916 B, 1001; Warfield v. Vandiver, 101 Md. 78, 60 Atl. Rep. 538, 4 Ann. Cas. 692; Green v. Weller, 32 Miss. 650; Commonwealth v.…
-
Hans v. Louisiana, 134 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1890)…had construed the judicial power as extending to such. a suit, and its decision was thus overruled. The court itself so understood the effect of the amendment, for, after its adoption, Attorney General Lee, in the case of Hollingsworth v. Virginia, 3 Dall. 378, submitted this question to the court, “ whether the amendment did, or did not, supersede all suits depending, as well as prevent the institution of new suits, against any one of the United States, by citizens of another State ? ” . Tilghmam, and,Ra…
Previewing 3 of 13 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence